The detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has agreed to consult his legal advisers before proceeding with his defence in the terrorism charges brought against him by the Federal Government.
At Wednesday’s hearing before Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, Kanu initially maintained that the charges against him were invalid but later consented to the court’s advice to seek proper legal guidance.
Kanu, who has been standing trial on a seven-count charge bordering on terrorism, listed his current legal team as Nnaemeka Ejiofor, Aloy Ejimakor, Maxwell Okpara, and Mandela Umegborogu.
Following his request, Justice Omotosho granted an adjournment until November 7, marking the fourth time the court has given the IPOB leader an opportunity to open his defence or formally waive his right to do so.
In October, Kanu dismissed his previous legal team led by former Attorney General of the Federation, Kanu Agabi (SAN), choosing to represent himself.
He had earlier submitted a list of 23 proposed witnesses, including Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and Federal Capital Territory Minister Nyesom Wike.
However, Kanu later changed his stance, arguing that the charges were baseless and not supported by any valid Nigerian law.
At Wednesday’s sitting, he reiterated that position, stating:
“The Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act has been repealed. I cannot put up a defence under a repealed law.”
He also claimed the prosecution failed to amend the charges as directed by the Supreme Court.
The prosecution, led by Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), reminded the court that the government had already closed its case on June 19, 2025, after presenting five witnesses.
Justice Omotosho had earlier ruled on September 26 that a prima facie case had been established, paving the way for Kanu to enter his defence.
Since then, Kanu has twice failed to do so, citing the unavailability of documents previously handled by his dismissed lawyers.
Awomolo urged the court to compel the defendant to either proceed with his defence or forfeit that right, stressing that the repeated delays were hindering the trial’s progress.
But Justice Omotosho, emphasizing fairness, said he would once again “bend backward” to give Kanu a final chance to consult lawyers experienced in criminal law.
“In the interest of justice, the defendant should have the benefit of competent legal advice before proceeding,” the judge ruled.
The matter was adjourned until November 7 for continuation of proceedings.
