The Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned to March 24, 2026, for ruling on a joinder application in a suit seeking the deregistration of the African Democratic Congress, Accord Party, Zenith Labour Party and Action Alliance over alleged constitutional breaches.
The case, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/25, was filed by the Incorporated Trustees of the National Forum of Former Legislators against the Independent National Electoral Commission, the Attorney-General of the Federation and the affected political parties.
Although the initial originating summons sought only the deregistration of the ADC, the plaintiffs later amended their processes to include the other parties, arguing that their continued recognition contravenes provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
At Tuesday’s proceedings before Justice Peter Lifu, appearances were entered for all parties except Action Alliance, where two separate lawyers — Ibrahim Yakubu and Bello Lukman — each claimed valid authority to represent the party.
When queried by the court, both counsel stated they were not acting jointly and had received independent instructions.
Justice Lifu directed them to resolve the representation dispute, cautioning that the court would take necessary steps if the issue remained unsettled.
Meanwhile, counsel to the Accord Party, Musibau Adetunbi (SAN), sought leave to file a further counter-affidavit in response to the amended originating summons.
He argued that additional facts required clarification to enable the court reach a just decision.
However, counsel to the plaintiffs, Yakubu Abdullahi Ruba (SAN), opposed the request, contending that the amended processes introduced no new facts warranting a further counter-affidavit and described the application as legally untenable.
Other counsel, including S.E. Aruwa (SAN), applied for an extension of time to regularise their filings and also filed a motion challenging the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the suit.
While the plaintiffs opposed the request for extension, one of the defence lawyers informed the court that he had recently been briefed and needed time to respond.
After hearing arguments, Justice Lifu granted the application for extension of time and deemed the plaintiff’s reply on points of law as properly filed.
The matter was subsequently adjourned to March 24 for ruling on the joinder application and other pending motions.
Speaking after the hearing, plaintiffs’ counsel maintained that the suit seeks judicial clarification of constitutional and statutory provisions governing the registration and continued recognition of political parties.
According to the court filings, the action relies on Section 225(a) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), Section 75(4) of the Electoral Act, 2022, and relevant provisions of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2019.
The plaintiffs argue that INEC is obligated to deregister political parties that fail to meet stipulated electoral performance thresholds, including securing at least 25 per cent of votes in one state during a presidential election or winning at least one elective seat at any level.
They are seeking declaratory reliefs compelling INEC to enforce these constitutional provisions, alongside injunctions restraining the commission from recognising the affected parties pending compliance.
The plaintiffs further contend that allowing such parties to participate in the 2027 general elections would overcrowd ballot papers, strain public resources and weaken electoral integrity.