The former Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Mudashiru Obasa, has claimed that Mojisola Meranda voluntarily stepped down as the Speaker of the House during a recent peace meeting.

Speaking on Politics Today, a Channels Television program, on Thursday, Obasa stated that Meranda resigned at a meeting held at the Lagos House in Marina last weekend.

“At the meeting held in Marina, which saw the attendance of all party leaders, it was made clear, with hopes that all members were present, that Meranda herself declared her resignation. She made it known that she has stepped down,” Obasa said.

He questioned the validity of any ongoing claims to the position, emphasizing that once a resignation is announced, the official privileges tied to the office are relinquished.

“Now, when someone resigns from office, the associated paraphernalia is taken away. So, the question arises: Have you also resigned? Because we understand that part of the arrangement is for you to step down as well. Let them present the resignation letter. And if I were to resign, would I still be here? I’m sure you’d still address me as Speaker, even though we’ve never had a conversation before,” he added.

The situation continues to unfold as questions remain over the leadership structure of the Lagos Assembly.

Detail shortly….

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (PDP) Kogi Central

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central, has insisted that the Senate Ethics and Disciplinary Committee must conduct its probe of her case in a transparent manner, calling for a live broadcast of the proceedings.

She argued that Nigerians have a right to witness the process firsthand.

The lawmaker was referred to the committee after a recent altercation with Senate President Godswill Akpabio over a seating arrangement.

While expressing her willingness to appear before the panel, she strongly opposed any attempt to handle the matter behind closed doors.

In a statement posted on her Facebook page on Thursday, Akpoti-Uduaghan revealed that she had previously chosen not to speak publicly about the issue and other developments within the Senate under Akpabio’s leadership but had now decided to break her silence.

“This petition came to my notice a few hours ago. In as much as I have refrained from publicly speaking on the matter and other occurrences in the Senate under President Akpabio, it’s time to break my silence,” she wrote.

The senator encouraged Nigerians to stay engaged with the proceedings, reaffirming her stance on transparency.

“Arise News, set a date, and I shall be in your studio in person. Spare no questions,” she added.

“And to Nigerians, please be sure to join the probe, which I shall insist must be covered live. The next few days and weeks shall be interesting but will shape the standard and quality of Nigeria’s leadership.”

Her demand has fueled public interest in the Senate’s internal processes, particularly in cases involving prominent lawmakers.

Many observers believe that a live broadcast would provide Nigerians with an opportunity to assess the fairness and credibility of the probe.

Political analysts suggest that how the Senate handles this case could set a precedent for legislative transparency in Nigeria.

As of now, the Ethics and Disciplinary Committee has not responded to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s request for a public hearing.

The coming days will reveal whether the Senate will grant her demand or uphold its usual closed-door approach.

Former President Goodluck Jonathan and ex-INEC Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, have expressed concerns over Nigeria’s electoral system, blaming flawed elections on political actors, the judiciary, and the electoral commission.

Speaking at the Reflection Conference on Democratic Elections in West Africa, organised by Yiaga Africa in Abuja, Jonathan emphasised the need for judicial accountability and electoral reforms, while Jega warned that the desperation of political elites, security threats, and corruption are putting democracy at risk in Nigeria and across West Africa.

Jonathan underscored the judiciary’s crucial role in ensuring credible elections, noting that corruption weakens the system and enables electoral malpractice.

“If elections must be done properly, then the judiciary must always play its role,” Jonathan said. “Every human being has the tendency to cheat. Even if you are born from heaven, as long as you are human, the feeling that you must exploit, you must cheat, is there. But if the environment does not permit it, then you become careful.”

Using a sports analogy, the former president compared governance to football, stressing that election authorities, like referees, shape the conduct of political players.

“Like I always compare the situation to football: if you have a referee and a VAR that tolerate nonsense, the players play anyhow. But if you get the no-nonsense referee, that means the INEC, which plays the role of the referee, and the judiciary look the other way, then the politicians will do whatever they like because they want to win by all means,” he said.

Jonathan shared a story about a judge who stood firm against political pressure.

“Somebody told me about a judge when a very senior politician and tough person called him to say, ‘You must do this,’ and he said, ‘I will not do it, even with a gun to my head.’ That is the kind of people we need right now,” he added.

Reflecting on elections across West Africa, Jonathan noted that while some nations have made progress, others still struggle with electoral violence, fraud, and weak institutions.

He pointed out that despite Nigeria’s peaceful transition of power in the February 2023 elections and the introduction of BVAS and IReV to enhance transparency, the process faced logistical failures, delayed voting, violence, and technical issues.

Narrating his own experience, Jonathan recalled an incident from his time in office.

“When Jega was there, he introduced the card reader, but during the election, the card reader rejected me and almost set the country ablaze. Because the card reader rejected me, rejected my wife, rejected my mother,” he said.

Jonathan highlighted Sierra Leone’s 2023 elections as another example of mixed results, with biometric voter registration failing to prevent allegations of voter suppression and ethnic tensions.

He praised Ghana, Liberia, and Senegal for conducting peaceful elections, particularly acknowledging President George Weah’s concession to opposition candidate Joseph Boakai in Liberia.

He emphasised that while technology plays a role in election transparency, human commitment remains the deciding factor.

“The deployment of technology, no matter how elaborate or sophisticated, may not deliver the desired outcomes without the proven will of the authorities and the citizens to do the right thing,” he said.

Calling on Nigeria to lead by example, Jonathan stressed the need for independent electoral bodies and professional security forces to safeguard democracy.

“The success or failure of any election lies in the hands of two critical agencies, which are the electoral management body and the police,” he stated.

Jega, in his remarks, raised concerns about the independence of Nigeria’s electoral body, urging reforms to protect its integrity.

He cited numerous challenges facing electoral commissions, including interference from desperate politicians, weak legal structures, and external disruptions like insecurity and misuse of technology.

“In West African countries, the modern history of representative elections is as much a tale of authoritarian manipulations as it is a saga of incumbency abuse to suppress opposition and control the media,” Jega said.

He warned that the failure of democracy to curb corruption and elite exploitation has fueled public discontent and created opportunities for coupists to return to power.

“The continuous exploitation of citizens by governing and ruling classes, combined with their exclusion from politics, has hastened democratic reversal, as seen in Mali, Burkina Faso, Guinea, and Niger since 2020,” Jega noted.

Linking these setbacks to growing security threats, Jega pointed to the aftermath of Libya’s civil war as a catalyst for arms proliferation and insurgency in the Sahel region.

He argued that colonial-era “divide and conquer” tactics continue to influence political divisions, fueling sectarian conflicts and exclusionary politics.

Jega described the political elite across West Africa as reckless, accusing them of sidelining voters and leaving governance open to manipulation.

He warned that the region’s democratic gains are at risk unless these challenges are urgently addressed.

“The reversals of democratisation gains, occasioned by these persistent challenges, have provided excuses for coupists to stage a comeback. This dangerous phenomenon could engulf the region unless addressed urgently,” he added.

The ongoing leadership crisis in the Lagos State House of Assembly took a dramatic turn on Thursday as former Speaker Mudashiru Obasa forcefully resumed office, despite his removal on January 13, 2025.

Obasa arrived at the Assembly complex around 11:30 AM, accompanied by heavily armed security personnel, creating a tense atmosphere.

His return was unexpected, particularly as the current Speaker, Mojisola Meranda, was absent at the time.

Although the Assembly is currently on an indefinite recess, reports indicate that Obasa gained access to the Speaker’s office by force.

“I’ve resumed, and I remain the Speaker of the Assembly,” Obasa declared, insisting on his position despite his ouster.

His return comes in the wake of the controversial withdrawal of security personnel assigned to Speaker Meranda, reportedly on the orders of the Inspector General of Police (IGP).

An aide to Meranda confirmed the development, stating that police officers and operatives of the State Security Service (SSS) were withdrawn, leaving her “exposed to threats amid the ongoing speakership crisis.”

The aide further called on Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu, the state’s Chief Security Officer, to intervene and prevent any potential breakdown of law and order.

The crisis deepened on Wednesday when Olalekan Onafeko, the former Clerk of the House who was suspended alongside Obasa, attempted to resume his duties but was denied entry by security personnel.

Onafeko, who arrived with his lawyer and security detail, was turned away amid jeers from Assembly staff.

A viral video captured the moment, while the Assembly management issued a statement condemning his “unauthorised entry.”

The leadership turmoil stems from the January 13 vote that saw 32 out of 40 Assembly members remove Obasa from office, citing “poor leadership style, perpetual lateness to legislative sessions and plenary, high-handedness and disregard for colleague lawmakers and the executive.”

Following his removal, Meranda was elected as Speaker.

Despite interventions from President Bola Tinubu, the Governance Advisory Council (GAC), Governor Sanwo-Olu, and the All Progressives Congress (APC), efforts to resolve the crisis have yielded little success.

High-profile meetings, involving APC stalwarts such as former governors Bisi Akande, Segun Osoba, and Akinwunmi Ambode, were held over the weekend in an attempt to broker peace.

Reports suggest that both Obasa and Meranda may be asked to step aside to allow a new Speaker to emerge, with a member of the Lagos West caucus said to be the frontrunner for the position.

Segun Ajiboye, the Chief Press Secretary (CPS) to Speaker Meranda, confirmed Obasa’s return to the Assembly complex and accused him of “breaking into the office.”

As tensions escalate, calls for immediate action to restore order have intensified.

Chief Muraina Taiwo, a member of the GAC, disclosed that the party is now considering one of the seven lawmakers from Lagos West as a possible consensus candidate for the Speakership.

Former President Goodluck Jonathan has reflected on the 2015 general elections, which he lost to ex-President Muhammadu Buhari, stating that the card reader rejected him, his wife, and his mother, nearly igniting a national crisis.

Speaking at the YIAGA Africa’s Reflection Conference on Democratic Elections in West Africa in Abuja on Tuesday, Jonathan emphasized that the success of any election depends largely on the conduct of the electoral management body and the police.

The event, themed “Strengthening Democratic Processes in West Africa: Lessons from the 2024 Elections and Prospects for Future Elections,” was supported by the European Commission, ECOWAS, and GIZ.

Jonathan stressed the importance of strong electoral institutions, stating, “Strengthen Electoral Institutions: Independent and impartial electoral commissions as well as non-partisan security operatives are the cornerstone of credible elections. We must invest in building the capacity of these institutions and safeguarding their independence from political interference.”

He further noted, “I always hold the view that the success or failure of any election lies in the hand of two critical agencies which are the electoral management body and the police. It goes without saying that the stability of a democracy is strongly tied to the way its elections are conducted and policed. If elections are not properly managed by security personnel who must be fair and just, the credibility of the electoral process and, by extension, the legitimacy of governance, could be undermined.”

Jonathan also acknowledged the growing role of youth in elections, describing their participation as one of the most crucial aspects of electoral reforms.

Reflecting on his personal experience in the 2015 election, he humorously recalled how the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), under the leadership of Prof. Attahiru Jega, introduced the card reader, which ended up rejecting him and his family at the polls.

“When Jega was there, he introduced the card reader, but during the election, the card reader rejected me and almost set the country ablaze. Because the card reader rejected me, rejected my wife, rejected my mother,” Jonathan said.

Despite this, he underscored the value of technological advancements in elections across West Africa, citing improvements in countries like Liberia, Senegal, and Ghana.

“It must be stated that high voter turnout in Liberia, Senegal, and Ghana, as well as the official transition of power in these countries, demonstrated public enthusiasm for democratic participation and consolidation. And I must commend the elections in Senegal. To me, it was one of the best elections I have observed in Africa and a few outside Africa,” he added.

Former INEC chairman, Prof. Jega, who delivered the keynote address, acknowledged concerns about democratic setbacks in the region but maintained that citizens still have a strong desire for accountable and representative governance.

“In spite of the worrisome evidence of backsliding of democratic progress in the West African region, there remains a substantial appetite among citizens for representative and accountable democratic government,” Jega said.

He emphasized the need for citizens, civil society organizations, and democratic actors to mobilize for credible and sustainable democratic development.

“Electing good representatives in governance and holding them to account would make government more responsible and responsive to the needs and aspirations of citizens for societal progress and socio-economic development,” he stated.

Jega acknowledged progress in strengthening independent election management bodies (EMBs) across West Africa but noted that there is still much work to be done.

Yiaga Africa’s Executive Director, Samson Itodo, highlighted that the conference provided a platform for stakeholders to reflect on electoral reforms in West Africa, focusing on both challenges and progress.

He explained, “The discussions were aimed at providing a comprehensive analysis of the 2024 elections, shedding light on key challen ges and opportunities for improvement.”

The Senate has unanimously decided to refer Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (PDP, Kogi Central) to the Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions for disciplinary review following a disagreement over seating arrangements.

The controversy erupted when Akpoti-Uduaghan confronted Senate President Godswill Akpabio upon discovering that her seat had been changed without prior notice.

The situation escalated into a heated argument during the February 20 plenary session.

The Senate Committee, chaired by Senator Neda Imaseun (LP, Edo South), has been given two weeks to investigate and report back on its findings.

Following a voice vote on the matter, lawmakers emphasized the importance of maintaining parliamentary rules and decorum.

Raising a motion under Senate Orders 1(b) and 10, Senate spokesperson Senator Yemi Adaramodu (APC, Ekiti South) criticized Akpoti-Uduaghan’s conduct, describing it as “extreme intransigence” and calling for disciplinary action.

“Where there is sin, there must be a penalty,” Adaramodu stated, urging the Senate leadership to uphold discipline.

Senate Leader Senator Opeyemi Bamidele supported Adaramodu’s stance, reiterating the Senate’s commitment to its rules and internal order.

“There is no one who does not have an opinion on this issue, but we are unified by our rules. Under our watch, we will not allow this institution to be discredited beyond what we inherited. Integrity is non-negotiable,” Bamidele said.

In response, Senate President Akpabio instructed the Committee on Ethics and Privileges to conduct a thorough review of the incident.

He pointed out that while Senate rules permit members to sit anywhere, contributions must be made from their designated seats.

Akpabio suggested that Akpoti-Uduaghan’s unfamiliarity with Senate procedures may have played a role in the confrontation.

“The first day she was sworn in, she stood up to contribute, and I was worried if she had even read the rule book. There is nothing wrong with being vibrant, but everything wrong with disobeying procedure,” he remarked.

Citing Order 66(2) and Section 55 of the Senate rules, Akpabio stressed that all senators must conduct themselves with decorum, noting specific prohibitions on chewing gum, drinking water, or being disruptive during sittings.

“The rules empower the Senate President to suspend a senator for infractions for at least 14 days. It’s not me who made the rules, it’s in the rule book,” he stated.

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has initiated legal action against Senate President Godswill Akpabio, alleging defamation.

The dispute arose after Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Senate seat was reassigned following a reshuffle triggered by opposition members switching to the majority wing.

Her resistance to the relocation led to a confrontation with the Senate President.

On February 25, 2025, Akpoti-Uduaghan filed a suit at the Federal Capital Territory High Court, naming Akpabio, the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and the Senate President’s Senior Legislative Aide, Mfon Patrick, as the first, second, and third defendants, respectively.

The case, marked CV/737/25, was filed through her lawyer, Victor Giwa, who claimed that defamatory statements made by the Senate President were published on Facebook by his aide.

Giwa referenced a post titled “Is the Local Content Committee of the Senate Natasha’s Birthright?”, which included a statement suggesting that Akpoti-Uduaghan believed being a lawmaker was only about “pancaking her face and wearing transparent outfits to the chambers.”

Describing the statement as defamatory, provocative, and damaging to her reputation, Giwa stated:

“A DECLARATION that the words, ‘It is bottled anger by the Kogi lawmaker, who knows nothing about legislative rules. She thinks being a lawmaker is all about pancaking her face and wearing transparent outfits to the chambers,’ used and written by the third defendant at the prompting of the first and second defendants, is defamatory and intended to cause public opprobrium and disaffection toward the claimant.”

Akpoti-Uduaghan also requested a court order preventing the defendants and their associates from making further defamatory remarks about her.

“AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the defendants, whether acting by themselves or through their agents, privies, assigns, or associates, from further publishing or causing to be published the said defamatory words or any similar publications about the claimant on social media or in any other manner capable of defaming her,” the suit stated.

Additionally, she sought N100 billion in general damages and N300 million to cover litigation costs.

“An order for the payment of the sum of N100,000,000,000 as general damages. An order for the payment of the sum of N300,000,000 as the cost of action,” she prayed.

The Special Adviser to President Bola Tinubu on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, has disagreed with former Vice President Yemi Osinbajo’s characterization of former military President Ibrahim Babangida as one of Tinubu’s tormentors.

Osinbajo made the remark during the public presentation of Babangida’s autobiography, A Journey in Service, at the Transcorp Hilton Hotel in Abuja last week.

While reviewing the book, Osinbajo recalled how Tinubu, who was then a senator, opposed the dissolution of the Senate by the military government following the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election.

He jokingly stated that Tinubu, once “tormented” by the military, including Babangida, for attempting to reconstitute the dissolved Senate, was now attending an event to honor one of his past tormentors.

However, Onanuga, speaking on Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily on Tuesday, refuted Osinbajo’s statement, arguing that Babangida was actually an inspiration for Tinubu’s political journey.

“I think the former Vice President got it wrong. I think Babangida was not really a tormentor of President Tinubu, don’t forget that President Tinubu said in his own extempore speech that he held Babangida as something, that he was the person that inspired him to get into politics.

“When Babangida came in, he was talking about new breed politicians and so on, and Tinubu like many of them were already technocrats or in private business and so on. All of them came out to participate in politics, that was what brought him in. So, he came there to pay homage,” Onanuga explained.

He further clarified that Tinubu’s real troubles began under General Sani Abacha when he and some of his colleagues attempted to reconvene the Senate in Lagos.

Onanuga also acknowledged Babangida’s recent admission that MKO Abiola won the 1993 presidential election but noted that the admission came too late.