The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has condemned its proscription by the Nigerian government in 2017, describing the decision as unjust, baseless, and a violation of constitutional rights.
In a statement issued Friday by its spokesperson, Comrade Emma Powerful, the separatist group questioned the legality of the proscription, insisting that it was outlawed without any evidence of wrongdoing or an opportunity to defend itself.
“There was no act of terror, no crime, no violence, nothing to justify our proscription,” the group stated.
“The proscription was not based on evidence or legal grounds.”
IPOB criticized the use of an ex parte order to secure the proscription, arguing that it was a violation of their right to a fair hearing, as guaranteed under Section 36(1) of the 1999 Constitution.
The group emphasized that the right to a fair hearing is fundamental and cannot be suspended under any circumstances.
It also referenced a court judgment that, according to them, had declared IPOB a lawful organization, a decision which, they noted, has not been overturned by any appellate court.
“Our only action has been to peacefully advocate for Biafra. We have not engaged in acts of violence or unlawful activity,” the statement reiterated.
The group appealed to the Nigerian public, legal experts, and civil society organizations to demand transparency regarding the 2017 proscription.
“We believe the public deserves to know the specific evidence, if any, that led to the designation in 2017,” IPOB said.
While affirming their commitment to nonviolence, the group vowed to continue pressing for its rights within the bounds of the law.
“We will remain peaceful and law-abiding, but we will also remain vocal in demanding our rights,” the statement concluded.
