Home Blog Page 145

Supreme Court Ends Kudirat Abiola Murder Case, Throws Out Lagos Appeal

The Supreme Court on Thursday formally brought to a close the protracted murder case of Alhaja Kudirat Abiola, dismissing an appeal by the Lagos State Government seeking to reopen the prosecution of Major Hamza Al-Mustapha (retd.).

In a unanimous ruling, a five-member panel of the apex court held that Lagos State abandoned its appeal against Al-Mustapha’s acquittal by failing to take any procedural steps for nine years.

Al-Mustapha, a former Chief Security Officer to late military ruler, General Sani Abacha, had been tried over the killing of Kudirat Abiola, wife of the presumed winner of the June 12, 1993, presidential election, Chief MKO Abiola.

Kudirat Abiola was assassinated in Lagos on June 4, 1996, during widespread protests against the annulment of the June 12 election.

Delivering the ruling, Justice Uwani Aba-Aji described the conduct of the Lagos State Government as inexcusable, noting that the state failed to act despite being granted leave by the Supreme Court in 2014 to pursue the appeal.

When the case was mentioned, counsel to Al-Mustapha, Paul Daudu (SAN), informed the court that Lagos State neither filed a notice of appeal nor took any steps to comply with the court’s directive over a nine-year period.

Daudu said the state was given 30 days in 2014 to file its appeal but failed to do so, arguing that the prolonged inaction clearly showed a lack of interest in pursuing the case.

He urged the court to dismiss the appeal on the ground of abandonment.

Justice Aba-Aji confirmed that court records showed Lagos State was duly served with hearing notices but neither appeared nor offered any explanation for its absence.

In a brief ruling, the court held that nine years was more than sufficient for the appellant to file the required processes and dismissed the appeal marked SC/CR/45/2014.

A related appeal filed by the Lagos State Government, marked SC/CR/6/2014, was also struck out on similar grounds.

The Supreme Court had, in 2014, granted Lagos State permission to appeal out of time against the July 12, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeal, which discharged and acquitted Al-Mustapha.

The order directed the state to file its notice of appeal within 30 days.

That decision followed claims by the state that it needed time to review the case and challenge the appellate court’s finding that the evidence against Al-Mustapha was weak and unreliable.

At the trial court, a Lagos High Court had on January 30, 2012 sentenced Al-Mustapha, Mohammed Abacha and Lateef Shofolahan to death by hanging for conspiracy and murder.

However, the Court of Appeal overturned the conviction in 2013 and freed the accused.

With Thursday’s ruling, the Supreme Court has effectively shut the door on all legal efforts to revive the case, nearly three decades after the assassination of Kudirat Abiola.

Google search engine

Fubara Is APC Leader In Rivers, Wike Has No Party Authority — Bwala

President Bola Tinubu’s Special Adviser on Policy Communication, Daniel Bwala, has declared that Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, is the recognised leader of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the state, dismissing claims linking former governor Nyesom Wike to the party’s leadership structure.

Bwala made the clarification on Thursday while speaking on Channels Television’s Hard Copy, against the backdrop of an ongoing political crisis in Rivers State that has seen the State House of Assembly commence impeachment proceedings against Governor Fubara.

According to Bwala, the position of the APC national leadership is unequivocal, stressing that Wike is not a member of the ruling party and therefore lacks the authority to speak or act on its behalf in Rivers State.

He said the party’s national chairman, Nentawe Yilwatda, had already made it clear that Fubara, as the sitting governor, is the APC leader in the state.

“In Rivers State, Governor Fubara is the leader of the APC. Wike is not a member of the APC, so he cannot speak for the party,” Bwala said.

He added that while Wike may be regarded as a leading figure within the Peoples Democratic Party in Rivers due to his past role as governor, such influence does not extend to the APC.

“He may be the leader of the PDP in Rivers State because they currently do not have a governor, but as far as the APC is concerned, Governor Fubara is the party leader in the state,” he stated.

Bwala further noted that President Tinubu supports internal party democracy, constitutional order, and the rule of law, insisting that the party would not condone any actions capable of undermining governance in Rivers State.

On the impeachment moves against Fubara, Bwala said the APC expects that the governor should be allowed to perform his constitutional duties without obstruction, particularly in light of existing court orders restraining the process.

“There are court orders stopping the impeachment. The party’s position is clear: nobody should stop Governor Fubara from governing Rivers State,” he said.

The presidential aide also clarified that Wike’s appointment as Minister of the Federal Capital Territory does not translate into leadership or authority within the APC, describing his role as one of service to the Federal Government rather than to the ruling party.

“The President believes in rewarding loyalty and service, but not at the expense of national interest or what is right,” Bwala said.

He urged all political stakeholders in Rivers State to respect constitutional processes, adding that the APC’s recognition of Fubara as party leader has effectively settled the internal dispute.

Governor Fubara formally joined the APC in December 2025 after defecting from the PDP and has since been endorsed by the party for a second term in the 2027 governorship election.

Meanwhile, members of the Rivers State House of Assembly have initiated impeachment proceedings against Fubara and his deputy, Ngozi Odu, citing allegations of gross misconduct, including financial mismanagement and constitutional violations.

Google search engine

Three Arrested Over Tricycle Theft In Enugu, Police Recover Vandalised Vehicle

Operatives of the Enugu State Police Command have arrested three male suspects in connection with the theft and vandalisation of a commercial tricycle in the Trans-Ekulu area of the state.

The suspects were arrested at about 5pm on January 20, 2026, by officers attached to the Trans-Ekulu Police Division, working in collaboration with members of the Neighbourhood Watch Group.

The arrest followed credible intelligence that the suspects were attempting to sell a stolen Bajaj tricycle at Ugbodogwu, Trans-Ekulu.

The stolen tricycle, painted yellow and black, was recovered from the suspects, identified as Chuka Nwanze, 23; Arinze Anyansi, 24; and Miracle Anyadiegwu, 24.

A statement issued on Friday by the Police Public Relations Officer of the command, SP Daniel Ndukwe, said preliminary investigations revealed that the tricycle, with Bauchi registration number NNG 445 WZ, was stolen from where it was parked in the Obiagu area of Enugu on the night of January 19, 2026.

According to the police, the suspects confessed during interrogation that they vandalised the tricycle after stealing it and sold off its three tyres.

They were reportedly in the process of disposing of the remaining parts when they were apprehended by the police.

SP Ndukwe disclosed that discreet investigations are ongoing to track down other members of the suspected tricycle theft syndicate and recover additional exhibits linked to the crime.

He added that the suspects will be arraigned in court upon the conclusion of investigations.

Meanwhile, the Commissioner of Police, Enugu State Command, Mamman Bitrus Giwa has reiterated the need for vehicle owners to remain vigilant.

He advised motorists to install basic security features on their vehicles to deter theft and assist in easy identification and recovery in the event of a crime.

Google search engine

US Formally Withdraws From WHO, Leaves $260m Funding Gap, Uncertainty For Global Health

 

The United States has formally withdrawn from the World Health Organization (WHO), marking a significant rupture between Washington and the UN’s global health agency and leaving a major funding gap in the organisation’s operations.

The exit follows an executive order signed by President Donald Trump a year ago, in which he accused the WHO of being overly deferential to China during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The US Department of Health and Human Services said the withdrawal was driven by what it described as the WHO’s mishandling of the pandemic, resistance to institutional reform, and susceptibility to political pressure from member states.

The WHO has strongly rejected those accusations.

Its Director-General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, described the US decision as a loss not only for the organisation but for global public health, including Americans.

He highlighted the WHO’s long-standing role in combating polio, HIV/AIDS, maternal mortality, and tobacco-related diseases, as well as coordinating responses to international health emergencies.

The withdrawal comes amid fragile global health recovery efforts following Covid-19.

In response to the pandemic, WHO member states negotiated a new international pandemic treaty aimed at improving preparedness, ensuring faster responses, and promoting fairer sharing of vaccines and treatments.

The treaty was adopted in April last year by all member states except the United States.

Historically, the US has been one of the WHO’s largest financial contributors.

However, it failed to pay its assessed contributions for 2024 and 2025, triggering large-scale job losses within the organisation.

WHO officials estimate US arrears at about $260m, but Washington has said it does not consider itself obliged to pay the outstanding amount.

US authorities confirmed that all government funding to the WHO has been terminated, American staff and contractors have been recalled from WHO offices worldwide, and hundreds of cooperative programmes have been suspended.

In a joint statement, US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy and Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused the organisation of abandoning its core mission and acting against US interests.

They added that future US engagement with the WHO would be limited to managing the withdrawal process and protecting domestic public health.

While the US said it would pursue bilateral arrangements with other countries for disease surveillance and pathogen sharing, officials were unable to provide details of any agreements already in place.

On global disease control efforts such as polio eradication and HIV prevention, US officials said Washington would rely on partnerships with non-governmental and faith-based organisations, though no specific arrangements were announced.

They also could not confirm whether the US would continue participating in the annual global influenza vaccine development process, a cornerstone of international disease surveillance.

The WHO said the US withdrawal will be discussed at its executive board meeting scheduled for early February, adding that the organisation would act in line with decisions taken by its governing bodies.

Public health experts warn that the US exit could weaken global coordination at a time when pandemic threats, antimicrobial resistance, and climate-related health risks are growing.

Several studies have already criticised the US pandemic response as slow and fragmented, arguing that delayed lockdowns, inconsistent mask policies, and politicisation of public health guidance contributed to higher mortality rates during Covid-19.

Despite the breakdown in relations, the WHO reiterated that decades of cooperation between the organisation and the United States have saved millions of lives worldwide and expressed hope that Washington may yet reconsider its decision in the interest of global health security.

Google search engine

Wike Takes Striking FCTA Workers To Court As Industrial Action Enters Second Week

The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, has dragged the Joint Unions Action Committee (JUAC) of the FCTA to court over the ongoing strike by FCTA workers, with a hearing scheduled for Monday.

The indefinite strike, launched by workers of the FCTA and the Federal Capital Development Authority on Monday, followed the expiration of a seven-day ultimatum and has paralyzed operations across key government offices in Abuja.

Security agencies, including the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and the Nigeria Police Force, were deployed to restrict access to the FCTA Secretariat.

While FCTA management maintains that most of the workers’ demands have been met, JUAC has rejected this claim, insisting that critical issues remain unresolved.

Court documents, sighted by DAILY GAZETTE correspondent, show that the lawsuit, filed at the Abuja Division of the National Industrial Court under suit number NICN/ABJ/17/2026, names the FCT Minister and the FCTA as claimants.

The defendants are JUAC President Rifkatu Iortyer and Secretary-General Abdullahi Saleh, sued in their representative capacities.

The suit seeks an order restraining the unions and their agents from engaging in picketing, obstruction, lockouts, or any actions directed at the claimants, departmental heads, and political appointees.

The unions are accused of blocking roads, shutting offices, and disrupting the smooth running of the FCT administration.

At Thursday’s hearing, the claimants were represented by a team of senior lawyers, including Ogwu Onoja, SAN; M.A. Ebute, SAN; George Ibrahim, SAN; K.O. Mustapha, Esq.; and Esther Audu, Esq. The defendants were absent.

After reviewing affidavits and submissions, Justice E.D. Subilim granted leave for substituted service of court processes on the union leaders.

The court ruled that service could be effected by publication in the Leadership Newspaper or any other national daily, and by pasting the processes at the JUAC office at the FCTA Secretariat in Garki, Abuja. Justice Subilim declared this mode of service valid and proper.

The matter was adjourned to January 26, 2026, for motion on notice.

Despite the legal challenge, JUAC has vowed to continue the strike.

In a statement signed by its Publicity Secretary, Holina Adejoh, the union urged workers to comply with its directive to stay away from work.

“We sincerely appreciate you for complying with the directive to stay at home. The strike action continues until our demands are met,” the statement said.

JUAC also confirmed awareness of the court action, insisting it would not be intimidated or suspend the strike.

“We will not relent in the struggle nor allow agents of oppression to cow us into submission. JUAC will not succumb to any form of intimidation or harassment by any means,” the union said, appealing for continued unity and compliance among workers.

Google search engine

LP Crisis: Repent, Sheathe Your Sword – Gov Otti Tells Abure Faction

Abia State Governor, Alex Otti, has called on the Julius Abure-led faction of the Labour Party (LP) to abandon internal conflicts, respect the recent Federal High Court ruling affirming Senator Nenadi Usman’s leadership, and align with the party’s lawful structures.

Reacting to the court judgment, Otti, through his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Ferdinand Ekeoma, assured that the Abure faction would be forgiven and reintegrated into the party if they “turn a new leaf and commit to being law-abiding.”

Describing the judgment as sound, the governor commended supporters and “lovers of democracy” who stood with LP during its turbulent period.

He urged those behind protracted and frivolous litigations against the party to sheathe their swords and adhere to the court’s decision, which aligns with the earlier verdict of the Supreme Court.

Otti also tasked the national leadership of the Labour Party to leverage the court victory as an opportunity to restructure the party, ensuring that peace, unity, and justice guide its operations in accordance with its constitution and core ideals.

Google search engine

How Apex Forensic Is Helping Nigerian Courts Uncover The Truth

On Tuesday, January 20, 2026, proceedings at the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja quietly marked what many legal observers now describe as a turning point for forensic science in Nigeria’s justice system.

At the centre of the moment was Chief Reginald Udunze, Managing Director and Chief Consultant Analyst of Apex Forensic Science Laboratory Nigeria Ltd., whose expert forensic report was admitted by the court as relevant and credible evidence.

For a system long troubled by document forgery, disputed signatures, and identity manipulation, the development was both significant and symbolic.

For years, Nigerian courts have struggled with cases where the truth was buried beneath forged documents and conflicting claims.

Often, judges were left to rely on circumstantial evidence or inconclusive expert opinions.

The testimony delivered by Chief Udunze, backed by decades of experience and advanced forensic analysis, demonstrated how science can decisively bridge that gap.

During his appearance before the court, Chief Udunze explained that he has spent 35 years working in forensic science, a career that spans document examination, handwriting analysis and complex fraud investigations.

His evidence focused on forensic markers that are invisible to the untrained eye but decisive in determining authenticity.

Observers in court noted the careful attention given by the judge to the testimony, especially given the technical depth of the evidence presented.

It was a clear indication that Nigerian courts are increasingly open to scientific methods that can strengthen judicial outcomes.

Analysts say the case underscores the urgent need for more seasoned forensic experts in the country.

In matters involving forgery and document fraud, experience combined with modern technology significantly reduces the risk of error. When science is applied correctly, ambiguity gives way to clarity.

In an interview, Chief Udunze said Apex Forensic was founded on a simple but demanding principle: the pursuit of truth through science.

“Our mission at Apex Forensic is truth and justice,” he said.

“We apply world-class forensic standards, including the ACE-V methodology, to resolve complex issues ranging from multilayered document fraud to criminal consultancy. Forensic science, at its core, is simply the application of science to law.”

He explained that court testimony is often the final and most critical stage of forensic work, where scientific findings must withstand legal scrutiny and help the court arrive at fair conclusions.

The events at the FCT High Court sent a clear signal: Nigeria is no longer playing catch-up in forensic science.

Through institutions like Apex Forensic Science Laboratory, truth is no longer guessed or assumed, it is examined, tested and proven.

Google search engine

Trump Led Criminal Plot To Overturn 2020 Election, Former US Prosecutor Says

 

Former US special counsel Jack Smith has defended his prosecution of former President Donald Trump, accusing him of orchestrating a criminal scheme aimed at overturning the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Smith made the allegation on Thursday while addressing the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee, where he said investigators gathered evidence establishing beyond reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal conduct after losing the election to Democrat Joe Biden.

“Rather than accept his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer of power,” Smith told lawmakers.

He said the decision to prosecute Trump was based strictly on the evidence and not influenced by politics, Trump’s party affiliation, or his candidacy in the 2024 presidential election.

Smith was appointed special counsel in 2022 and subsequently charged Trump over efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, as well as for the alleged mishandling of classified documents after leaving the White House.

Trump denied all allegations, describing the prosecutions as politically motivated and accusing the Justice Department of being weaponised against him.

Neither case went to trial. In line with long-standing Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president, Smith dropped the cases after Trump won the November 2024 presidential election and returned to office.

Smith maintained that the rule of law guided his actions, insisting that political status should not shield anyone from accountability.

“If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of party,” he said.

“No one should be above the law.”

Smith’s public testimony followed a closed-door appearance before the same committee more than a month earlier.

His request for that initial deposition to be held publicly was rejected by the committee’s Republican majority.

Since returning to office, Trump has called on the Justice Department to pursue investigations against Smith and several perceived political opponents, repeatedly attacking the former special counsel in public statements.

Meanwhile, recent cases brought against Trump critics, including former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, collapsed last year after a judge ruled that the prosecutor involved was unlawfully appointed.

Google search engine

Jail Tax Evaders to Enforce Compliance, Oshiomhole Tells FG

 

Senator representing Edo North, Adams Oshiomhole, has called on the Federal Government to jail tax evaders as a way of strengthening compliance and deterring others from violating tax laws.

Oshiomhole made the call on Wednesday while speaking on Channels Television’s Politics Today programme, where he argued that resistance to taxation, particularly value-added tax (VAT), is largely a Nigerian phenomenon.

According to him, the newly enacted tax laws are designed to protect low-income earners while ensuring that those who earn more contribute fairly to national revenue. He stressed that tax compliance should not be treated as optional.

“Taxes must be paid by those who are supposed to pay them and must be ruthlessly collected. It is not merely a civil obligation. Breaching tax laws is a criminal offence, and serious governments send offenders to prison when they refuse to pay or manipulate tax records,” Oshiomhole said.

The former Edo State governor explained that the current tax framework reflects the principles of a progressive system, placing a higher burden on high-income earners while shielding the poor.

He also clarified that VAT mainly applies to luxury and non-essential items, not basic goods, and criticised Nigerians who oppose paying local taxes but readily comply with similar obligations abroad.

Oshiomhole maintained that President Bola Tinubu’s tax reforms align with progressive governance, noting that exemptions are built into the system for those who earn less.

“This is a progressive tax policy that places a higher burden on those who earn more while offering relief to low-income earners,” he said.

He added that widespread misunderstanding of how government revenue works contributes to public resistance to taxation.

“Governments do not earn money on their own. Citizens earn income, and government revenue comes from taxes paid by individuals and corporations. These taxes determine the annual income of the state,” Oshiomhole explained.

Google search engine

2027: ADC Rules Out Obi’s Return To LP, Says Court Verdict Strengthens Coalition

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has dismissed speculations that the recent court ruling affirming Senator Nenadi Usman as acting National Chairman of the Labour Party (LP) could trigger the return of Mr Peter Obi to the LP.

The party said the judgment would neither weaken the opposition coalition nor affect preparations aimed at unseating President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the 2027 general elections.

Speaking with DAILY GAZETTE in Abuja, ADC National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, stated that the ruling does not substantially alter political alignments ahead of the next elections.

He explained that the affirmation of Senator Usman’s leadership by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has no bearing on Mr Obi’s political decision, stressing that Obi has already openly aligned with the ADC.

“The ruling does not change anything substantially. Mr Peter Obi has declared openly for the ADC, and that settles the matter,” Abdullahi said.

He added that Senator Usman has also been a key figure within the opposition coalition from its inception, noting that the court verdict would only reinforce the alliance rather than weaken it.

“If anything, this judgment will only make the coalition stronger,” he added.

Barrister Julius Abure, who emerged as Labour Party National Chairman following a National Executive Council meeting in 2021, was recently removed following a series of legal battles over the party’s leadership.

Subsequently, INEC recognised former Finance Minister, Senator Nenadi Usman, as the legitimate acting chairman of the LP.

Mr Obi, who placed third in the 2023 presidential election on the platform of the Labour Party, had earlier exited the party amid a prolonged leadership crisis marked by conflicting court judgments and internal disputes.

Despite what some observers describe as a resolution of the LP leadership tussle, ADC maintained that there is no basis for fears that Obi would return to his former party.

Meanwhile, a Federal High Court in Abuja has removed the Abure-led executive of the Labour Party and nullified the candidates produced under its leadership for election purposes, holding that Abure’s tenure as national chairman had elapsed.

Google search engine

- Advertisement -
Google search engine

MOST COMMENTED