The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has vowed to clamp down hard on computer-based test (CBT) centres involved in large-scale examination malpractice during the 2025 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME).
Chairman of the JAMB Special Committee on Examination Infractions (SCEIi), Jake Epelle, revealed that over 4,000 cases of fraud were discovered, including advanced technological cheating such as fingerprint manipulation and AI-assisted impersonation.
“What we saw is mind-blowing,” Epelle said on Channels TV’s Politics Today.
“These young people have a lot of technology in their hands. Many CBT centres will be shut down, their equipment seized, and their owners jailed.”
According to the committee’s report, 4,251 cases of fingerprint manipulation (also referred to as “finger blending”) were identified.
192 cases of AI-powered impersonation through image morphing were discovered while additional offenses included 1,878 fake disability claims, forged credentials, multiple NIN registrations and collusion with syndicates.
Epelle stressed that these findings expose serious vulnerabilities in the education system, despite JAMB’s use of sophisticated technologies.
He said the situation would have been far worse without the agency’s proactive use of technology to detect fraud.
The committee chair placed much of the blame on parents.
“Eighty percent of these infractions are caused by parents trying to secure marks their children don’t deserve,” Epelle said, calling on JAMB to “name and shame” those involved.
He added that while parents were the primary drivers, schools and tutorial centres also played a role in the malpractice network.
He further criticized some of the accused parents for publicly attacking JAMB, sometimes bringing lawyers (including Senior Advocates of Nigeria) to threaten lawsuits—only to later beg for forgiveness once confronted with evidence.
Addressing concerns about whether JAMB’s systems had been compromised, Epelle clarified that the problem was not with the agency’s technology but rather with how fraudsters were exploiting AI tools to bypass security.
“We are living in an AI era. It’s not about JAMB’s failure—it’s about how tech-savvy criminals are becoming,” he said.
While his committee did not investigate the 2025 UTME technical glitches that led to widespread low scores, Epelle confirmed that another team had conducted that inquiry and submitted its findings to the JAMB Registrar and the Minister of Education.
The committee recommended several reforms, including Use of AI-driven biometric anomaly detection, Real-time exam monitoring and Establishment of a Central Exam Security Operations Centre
The 2025 UTME was marred by widespread dissatisfaction over poor scores. In May, JAMB admitted that technical glitches affected results in 157 of 887 centres, leading to mass underperformance.
JAMB announced that 379,997 affected candidates would retake the exam starting May 16, 2025.
Registrar Prof. Ishaq Oloyede publicly apologized, admitting to the errors and reaffirming the board’s commitment to fairness and transparency, even breaking down in tears during the press briefing.
“We are not perfect, but we are committed to getting it right,” Oloyede said.
Out of 1,955,069 candidates who sat for the 2025 UTME:
1,534,654 candidates (78.5%) scored below 200
Only 4,756 candidates (0.24%) scored 320 and above
7,658 (0.39%) scored 300–319
73,441 (3.76%) scored 250–299
The largest group, 983,187 candidates (50.29%), scored between 160–1994
88,197 (24.97%) scored 140–159
Only 2,031 candidates (0.10%) scored below 100
JAMB dismissed conspiracy theories suggesting bias against any region and has launched a full review of its processes.