Home Blog Page 619

Kano Blasphemy Law Violates Global Human Rights Standards – ECOWAS Court Rules

 

The Community Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has delivered a landmark ruling declaring sections of Kano State’s blasphemy laws to be in violation of Nigeria’s international human rights obligations.

In the case Incorporated Trustees of Expression Now Human Rights Initiative v. Federal Republic of Nigeria (ECW/CCJ/APP/41/23), the court held that certain provisions within Kano’s legal framework infringed on freedom of expression rights guaranteed under both regional and global human rights instruments.

The case, filed by the Incorporated Trustees of Expression Now Human Rights Initiative—a Nigerian human rights NGO—challenged blasphemy laws that it said had triggered serious human rights violations.

The group cited multiple instances of arbitrary arrests, prolonged detentions, and even death sentences imposed on individuals accused of blasphemy.

The NGO also raised concerns over vigilante-style justice, claiming some individuals were murdered by mobs following accusations of blasphemy, with the Nigerian state allegedly failing to protect citizens’ fundamental rights to life, religious freedom, and expression.

In its verdict, the ECOWAS Court affirmed its authority to hear the matter under Article 9(4) of its protocol, which empowers it to address human rights breaches across member states.

While it dismissed the claims relating to the rights to life and religious freedom—stating these could not be pursued through public interest litigation—the court allowed the claims on freedom of expression to proceed.

The judges found that two central blasphemy provisions under Kano State law did not meet international standards.

Specifically, Section 210 of the Kano Penal Code was deemed too vague, lacking the legal clarity necessary to define what qualifies as a religious insult.

The court also invalidated Section 382(b) of the Kano State Sharia Penal Code Law (2000), which prescribes the death penalty for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.

The panel ruled this punishment to be “excessive and disproportionate” in a democratic context.

Though the court acknowledged states’ rights to uphold public order and religious respect, it ruled that the laws in question failed to meet the international legal standards of “legality, necessity, and proportionality” as required under Article 9(2) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

On the allegations of government inaction in preventing mob violence linked to blasphemy claims, the court concluded that the evidence presented—mostly media reports—did not meet the threshold for admissible proof.

The decision was handed down by a three-member panel of ECOWAS justices: Hon. Justice Ricardo Cláudio Monteiro Gonçalves (Presiding Judge), Hon. Justice Sengu Mohamed Koroma, and Hon. Justice Dupe Atoki (Judge Rapporteur).

Google search engine

‘Bring Back Our Fubara’: Rivers Women Demand Governor’s Reinstatement

 

Hundreds of women took to the streets of Port Harcourt on Friday, calling for the immediate reinstatement of suspended Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy, Ngozi Odu.

Gathering first at Isaac Boro Park, the demonstrators—who identified themselves as mothers and wives—marched along Aba Road to the Government House, carrying placards that read, Bring back Fubara,”

“Save our democracy,” “Is the law different for Rivers State?” and “God of justice, arise for Rivers State.”

Chanting protest songs, the women made a direct appeal to President Bola Tinubu to reverse the suspension of the governor and restore democratic structures in the state.

“We are a peaceful people and do not deserve this kind of injustice. The governor has been doing his job despite the distractions. What is happening now is not democracy,” one of the protesters told Channels Television.

The protestors denounced what they described as an “unconstitutional military rule masked as a state of emergency,” insisting that the people of Rivers State deserve governance rooted in democratic principles.

Leaders of the protest, while speaking with Channels Television, maintained that the ongoing political crisis had not deterred Fubara from fulfilling his duties.

They expressed frustration over what they perceive as a coordinated attempt to undermine the will of the electorate.

“We are here to defend our votes and the sanctity of our democracy. This is beyond Fubara; it’s about justice and the future of Rivers State,” one of the leaders said.

They emphasized that their demonstration was not politically motivated, but rather a stand for justice, peace, and the rule of law.

Women of all ages participated, ensuring the protest remained peaceful throughout.

Fubara, his deputy, and members of the state’s House of Assembly were suspended amid an ongoing political crisis that has rocked the oil-rich state.

In response, President Tinubu appointed Ibok-Ete Ibas as sole administrator to oversee the state’s affairs.

Google search engine

Convicted Niger State Official Reinstated Weeks After Bribery Sentence, Receives Full Salary While ‘In Prison’

 

Umar Farouk, a Deputy Director in the Niger State Ministry of Land Transportation, who was recently convicted for collecting a N11 million bribe, has reportedly been reinstated to his civil service position just two weeks after being sentenced to seven years in prison.

Investigation uncovered that despite the Niger State High Court’s judgment against Farouk, he was discreetly released from custody and has resumed his role in government, continuing to receive full salary and benefits during what was supposed to be his incarceration.

“How the case came up was that when I wanted to collect a contract from them, he demanded a bribe. When he was sentenced to seven years imprisonment, I was relieved. But just two weeks later, I discovered he was out of prison,” the contractor who filed the initial petition told newsmen.

“When he was released after two weeks, the people concerned protested. They were sad; why would someone go to prison and be released within two weeks and even reinstated into the civil service? The protest led to his suspension, but after that, nothing else happened.”

“He is back working now like nothing happened. I was the one who filed the petition that led to his conviction. I’m shocked the government did not let him serve his sentence,” he added.

According to insiders, Farouk’s name was quietly added to a list of 104 inmates granted a pardon by the former administration of Governor Abubakar Sani Bello. However, this inclusion is believed to have been manipulated.

“Because they wanted to free him, they had to free 104 inmates alongside him. His name was smuggled into the document,” a source within the Niger State civil service alleged.

“This was orchestrated by a former Commissioner of Justice. The governor at the time was not even aware.”

Another source within the Ministry of Transportation confirmed, “During his time in prison, the government did not stop his salaries. He was being paid. Now he is back on the payroll as if nothing ever happened.”

SaharaReporters’ findings show that in the final week of his administration in 2023, Governor Bello pardoned 24 convicts and paid N20 million in fines for 80 others to facilitate their release.

It is alleged that this move was engineered by the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice at the time, Nasara Danmallam—a close associate of Farouk.

“This was done between a former commissioner and Umar Farouk. They used to do these dirty deals together. That’s why they didn’t let him suffer in prison,” said another insider.

When reached for comment, Farouk confirmed his return to public service but denied any wrongdoing in the process of his release.

“I was not smuggled out of the prison, I was out of the prison by a process, not illegally,” he said.

When asked for details on that process, he declined to elaborate.

“Go and meet my superior, the State Head of Service. You know I am under someone,” he stated.

Hadiza Idris Kuta, the current Commissioner for Transport, also confirmed Farouk’s reinstatement.

“I also investigated the matter. I was told the man was out of prison because he was pardoned. That was done by the past government,” she said.

“I know he is reinstated into the civil service but he is no longer in my ministry.”

She refused to disclose what position Farouk now holds in the civil service.

Farouk’s initial conviction stemmed from a prolonged trial prosecuted by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).

He was charged in 2020 with multiple counts of gratification and abuse of office for accepting N11 million from a contractor in exchange for awarding a state contract.

“The accused person is standing trial on a 7-count charge for the offences of gratification by an official and using office or position for gratification contrary to Sections 8(1)(a)(ii) and 19 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000,” the judgment read.

“I find the accused person guilty as charged on all counts… Accordingly, the convict is sentenced to imprisonment for 7 years for each of the offences in counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.”

 

Google search engine

Russia, US Swap Prisoners In Effort To Strengthen Bilateral Ties

 

A Los Angeles-based ballet dancer who was recently released by Russia in a prisoner swap safely arrived in the United States on Thursday night, marking the second such swap under President Donald Trump as both Moscow and Washington work to rebuild their strained relationship.

Ksenia Karelina, a dual US-Russian citizen who had been convicted of “treason” in Russia for a $50 donation to a pro-Ukraine charity, landed at Joint Base Andrews shortly before 11:00 PM local time Thursday (0300 GMT). Karelina was warmly greeted by several loved ones, including her boyfriend, South African boxer Chris van Heerden, who cheered and shouted, “Welcome home!” as they embraced.

In exchange, the US freed Arthur Petrov, a Russian-German national who had been accused of illegally exporting US-made electronics to companies supplying the Russian military.

The swap took place at an airport in Abu Dhabi, where a dozen individuals dressed in suits were reportedly present, as shown in video footage shared by Russia’s FSB security service.

Trump has worked to reset relations with Moscow since assuming office, despite the sharp decline in US-Russia ties following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Trump remarked that Karelina’s case had been brought to his attention by the president of the UFC, a mixed martial arts organization, and that the United States then requested Russian President Vladimir Putin’s assistance in securing her release.

“She is now out, and that was good. So we appreciate that,” Trump said during a cabinet meeting, adding, “We hope that we’re going to be able to make a deal relatively soon with Russia and Ukraine to stop the fighting. It’s so senseless.”

The video from FSB showed Petrov aboard a plane after his release, where he described having not slept for two days but made no other complaints.

Petrov, arrested in Cyprus in 2023 and subsequently extradited to the US, had been facing up to 20 years in prison.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe was heavily involved in the negotiations with Russian intelligence and other international partners, according to a CIA spokesperson.

Ratcliffe thanked the UAE for facilitating the exchange, noting that while this was a positive development, there were still other Americans being wrongfully detained in Russia.

“We see this exchange as a positive step and will continue to work for their release,” the spokesperson stated.

The State Department also raised the case of Stephen Hubbard, a British teacher who was detained by Russian forces during their invasion of Ukraine.

Hubbard is accused of being a mercenary, a charge the US disputes.

“We continue to work to free Mr. Hubbard and all other Americans unjustly detained,” said State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce.

As the prisoner swap occurred, US and Russian officials met in Istanbul to discuss restoring embassy staffing levels, which had been reduced due to mutual expulsion of diplomats.

The State Department reported that Washington renewed concerns about Moscow’s prohibition of US citizens working in US missions in Russia, while both countries also sought to formalize an agreement on banking access for diplomats despite US sanctions.

Karelina, 33, was serving a 12-year sentence for donating to a pro-Ukraine charity.

She was arrested in January 2024 while visiting family in Yekaterinburg, Russia, and charged with “treason” for allegedly aiding Ukraine’s military.

However, Karelina and her supporters argue that her donation was only to a US-based humanitarian group.

Petrov, on the other hand, was accused of illegally exporting US electronics for military purposes, violating sanctions imposed on Russia over the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Earlier this year, in February, following a call between Presidents Putin and Trump, Russia released Kalob Wayne Byers, a US citizen arrested for carrying cannabis edibles at Moscow’s airport.

Similarly, in early February, the US and Russia swapped teacher Marc Fogel for Russian computer expert Alexander Vinnik.

The largest US-Russia prisoner exchange since the Cold War occurred on August 1, 2024, when several journalists, including Evan Gershkovich from The Wall Street Journal, and dissidents held in Russia were exchanged for alleged Russian spies detained in the West.

Google search engine

Police Rescue Kidnapped Ebonyi Govt Official, Apprehend One Suspect

 

The Coordinator of Ngbo Central Development Centre in Ohaukwu Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, Blessing Adagba, who was abducted by gunmen last Thursday, has been rescued after spending five days in captivity.

Adagba was taken from her hometown, Okposhi Eheku community, by unidentified gunmen.

Her release was confirmed on Wednesday evening during a phone interview with Channels Television by the Ebonyi State Police Public Relations Officer, SP Joshua Ukandu.

Ukandu attributed her freedom to the swift intervention and coordinated efforts of officers and men of the Nigeria Police Force in the state.

“The victim was released Tuesday night. During the tracking of the suspects, after the release of the victim, we were able to arrest one of the syndicates,” he stated.

He further expressed optimism that the arrest would aid in dismantling the entire kidnap gang.

“We hope that the arrest of suspect will help our men in fishing out the rest of the gang,” Ukandu added.

Police investigations are ongoing to apprehend the remaining members of the criminal group.

Google search engine

NBA Relocates 2025 Conference From Rivers To Enugu Over ‘Unconstitutional’ Emergency Rule

 

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has announced the relocation of its 2025 Annual General Conference (AGC) from Port Harcourt, Rivers State, to Enugu.

This decision comes in response to President Bola Tinubu’s recent declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State and the appointment of a sole administrator, which the NBA considers unconstitutional.

In a joint statement issued late Thursday by NBA President Afam Osigwe (SAN), General Secretary Mobolaji Ojibara, and Chairman of the AGC Planning Committee, Emeka Obegolu (SAN), the association explained the rationale behind the change of venue.

“The announcement that Port Harcourt, the Garden City, would host the 2025 Annual General Conference (AGC) of our Association was met with widespread enthusiasm,” the NBA said.

“Indeed, prior to the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State on March 18, 2025, registration figures had soared, reflecting the excitement and eagerness of members to attend.”

However, the association noted that recent developments in the state, especially the imposition of a sole administrator described as a retired military officer using a “command-style approach,” undermined constitutional democracy and halted the momentum for the conference.

“Currently, Rivers State is being governed by a retired military officer, appointed as a Sole Administrator, who operates with a command-style approach that disregards constitutional provisions, court decisions, and pending litigation,” the statement said.

“His actions have undermined democratic institutions and processes, flouting the rule of law with impunity. Though clad in civilian attire, he governs as though the state is under military rule.”

According to the NBA, growing discontent among members prompted leadership consultations, including meetings with Rivers State branch chairmen and an emergency National Executive Council (NEC) session on March 27, 2025.

“The voices of our members, particularly those calling for a change of venue, grew stronger over time,” the NBA said.

“We convened meetings with the Chairmen of NBA branches in Rivers State and held an emergency session of the National Executive Council (NEC) on the 27th of March, 2025. The overwhelming consensus was that the NBA could not, in good conscience, proceed with the AGC in a state governed unconstitutionally by a Sole Administrator.”

The NEC also took issue with the manner in which the emergency rule was ratified by the National Assembly.

“The NEC reaffirmed that the state of emergency declared in Rivers State violates Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution,” the statement said.

“It further noted that the suspension of elected officials and democratic institutions contravenes Sections 11 and 188 of the Constitution.”

“The purported ratification by the National Assembly, executed via voice vote rather than the constitutionally required two-thirds majority amounts to a grave constitutional subversion. Even if the proper procedure had been followed, it would not legitimize an unconstitutional proclamation.”

As a result, the NBA emphasized that holding its flagship conference in Rivers State would amount to condoning constitutional breaches.

“To hold the conference under such undemocratic developments would amount to a tacit endorsement of constitutional violations and subversion of the rule of law,” the statement added.

The association confirmed the new venue will be Enugu, a city it described as historically significant and well-equipped for the event.

“The NBA has taken a principled position in accordance with the law: the appointment of a Sole Administrator in Rivers State is unconstitutional. Consequently, and in alignment with the overwhelming position of NEC and the broader membership, we are compelled to relocate the 2025 AGC to a state where constitutional democracy remains intact.”

“We are pleased to announce that the 2025 Annual General Conference will now be held in the historic Coal City of Enugu. The city possesses the infrastructure and capacity to host a conference of our scale and significance.”

“We are confident that, with concerted efforts, this change of venue will not compromise our commitment to delivering a successful and impactful Conference.”

The NBA concluded by rallying members to support the new plans: “We call on all members and stakeholders to lend their full support as we embark on this new path. With unity, diligence, and a shared commitment to our values, we will make this transition a resounding success.”

Google search engine

Court Okays Substituted Service For Two Petitioners In Recall Case Against Senator Natasha

 

A Federal High Court sitting in Lokoja has approved an application for substituted service of hearing notices on two petitioners involved in the ongoing recall case against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

Justice Isa Dashen granted the ex parte application on Thursday, following a request by the plaintiffs’ counsel, Ehiogie West-Idahosa, SAN.

The case stems from a suit filed on March 20 by five plaintiffs—Anebe Jacob-Ogirima, John Adebisi, Musa Siyaka-Adeiza, Ahmed Usman, and Maleek Yahaya—who secured an ex parte motion that temporarily barred INEC from accepting any recall petition targeting Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan.

However, on March 24, the same court reversed that order after INEC contested it by filing a motion, stating that “no person or institution could prevent it from fulfilling its constitutional duties.”

That same day, several constituents from Kogi Central submitted a formal recall petition against the senator, citing allegations of misconduct during her time in the National Assembly.

INEC, however, later ruled the petition “incompetent and null.”

Despite the electoral body’s stance, the plaintiffs pursued their case and named two more individuals—Salihu Habib and Charity Omole—as defendants, accusing them of being among the signatories to the recall petition.

During Thursday’s hearing, West-Idahosa, represented by Smart Nwachimere, explained to the court that efforts to serve Habib and Omole with the originating summons and hearing notices had been unsuccessful.

He revealed, “the duo were among those who signed the petition against Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan.”

In response, Justice Dashen approved the plaintiffs’ request to serve the documents through substituted means.

Google search engine

Obi’s ‘Illegal’ NEC Meeting A Resort To Self-Help, Attempt To Hijack Party Leadership – Labour Party

 

The Labour Party (LP) has raised strong objections to what it described as a clandestine attempt by Abia State Governor, Alex Otti, and the party’s 2023 presidential flagbearer, Peter Obi, to seize control of the party’s structure.

In a statement issued in Kaduna on Thursday, the party’s National Secretary, Umar Farouk Ibrahim, denounced a National Executive Council (NEC) meeting convened by the duo in Abuja, labeling it as unconstitutional and unauthorized.

“At the end of their illegal meeting in Abuja, Mr Obi led other party outlaws to the headquarters of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in an attempt to pressure the Commission to take unlawful action against the party leadership,” Ibrahim stated.

He described the move as “a high level of desperation to seize control of the party’s structure,” and questioned the urgency, saying: “If the Supreme Court ruling truly supports them, why the rush to INEC to exert undue influence?”

According to Ibrahim, Obi and Otti also attempted to broker a deal with National Chairman Julius Abure by offering him the position of Chairman of the Board of Trustees in exchange for stepping aside.

“But unfortunately for them, Abure did not appoint himself chairman. It is not about personalities; it is about the supremacy of party organs and adherence to due process,” he insisted.

“It is not within anyone’s prerogative to allocate positions. This sort of political patronage undermines the sanctity of our democratic institutions. Such arbitrary behaviour by leaders is partly responsible for the state of governance in the country,” he added.

The LP secretary alleged that the Abuja gathering also included threats and covert plans to reclaim the party’s leadership through force.

He pointed to the Supreme Court ruling which, he said, clearly affirmed that only the National Secretary, in consultation with the National Chairman, is empowered to summon a NEC meeting.

“Obi and Otti lack the constitutional authority to convene such a meeting. Therefore, both the meeting and its resolutions are null and void,” Ibrahim declared.

Referring to the list of those who attended the meeting, he said it reflected the illegitimacy of the event.

The roll call included Obi’s 2023 running mate, serving and former lawmakers, members of the self-styled “National Caretaker Committee,” and representatives from the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC).

“There is no mention of any ‘National Caretaker Committee’ in our party constitution. Nor is there any provision for a governor or former presidential candidate to convene a NEC meeting,” he clarified.

He also referenced the position of labour union leader, Comrade Joe Ajaero, who has threatened to picket LP offices nationwide.

“Our immediate response to Obi, Otti and other renegades is that their plans amount to self-help. If the court ruling is in their favour, there are legal means to enforce it. Intimidation and threats will not yield positive outcomes,” Ibrahim warned.

He concluded by cautioning that leaders who cannot abide by internal party rules while out of office are unlikely to uphold the national constitution if they ever assume power.

“We condemn this illegal meeting in totality and urge members and the public to disregard both the gathering and its outcomes,” he said.

Google search engine

Rivers Govt Dismisses Rumoured Recruitment Of 10,000 Graduates

 

The Rivers State Government has debunked claims circulating on social media and other platforms that it has approved the recruitment of 10,000 graduates and non-graduates into the state civil service.

The report, which alleged that the recruitment portal would open on the midnight of Sunday, April 13, further claimed that the approval was given by the state’s Sole Administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas (rtd), and signed by Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Lucky Worika.

However, in a swift response, Dr. Inyingi Brown, the Acting Head of the Rivers State Civil Service, dismissed the information as false.

“The announcement is fake,” she said, urging members of the public to disregard the report entirely.

She clarified that any authentic information regarding recruitment into the civil service would be officially issued by the Rivers State Civil Service Commission when appropriate.

“An appropriate information will be released by the Rivers State Civil Service Commission when it falls due,” Brown assured.

 

Google search engine

Four Men Publicly Executed In One Day

 

In a display of capital punishment, four men were publicly executed across three Afghan provinces on Friday, marking the highest number of public executions in a single day since the Taliban reclaimed power in 2021, according to the country’s Supreme Court.

The executions were carried out in front of crowds at sports stadiums in Badghis, Nimroz, and Farah provinces.

The Taliban said the men had been convicted of murder and sentenced to “qisas”, a form of retributive justice under Islamic law that allows victims’ families to demand the death penalty.

In Qala-i-Naw, the capital of Badghis province, two of the men were shot multiple times by relatives of their victims, as dozens of people looked on.

Eyewitnesses described a grim scene where the men were made to sit facing away from the crowd before being executed.

“They sat with their backs to the spectators, and the victims’ relatives stood behind and shot them,” said Mohammad Iqbal Rahimyar, a witness at the scene.

Official notices had been distributed a day earlier, encouraging locals to attend the executions.

The Taliban Supreme Court stated the cases had been “thoroughly examined,” and the families had declined to grant amnesty to the convicts.

In separate incidents, another man was executed in Zaranj, the capital of Nimroz province, and a fourth was put to death in Farah city.

Some spectators voiced support for the executions, viewing them as a demonstration of law and order under Taliban rule.

“It’s good that the Islamic Emirate shows its politics and force,” said Javid, a 30-year-old man who attended one of the executions.

However, human rights organisations, including Amnesty International, swiftly condemned the actions.

Amnesty described the public executions as a “gross affront to human dignity,” and reiterated concerns about the Taliban’s disregard for fair trial standards and international human rights norms.

Public executions were common under the Taliban’s first regime from 1996 to 2001, with many held in stadiums and drawing large crowds.

The group has resumed the practice since returning to power, despite international condemnation.

The latest executions bring the total number of public deaths under the Taliban to 10 since 2021, based on an AFP count.

The previous such case occurred in November 2024, when a man convicted of murder was shot in front of a crowd that included top Taliban officials.

Corporal punishment — including public floggings — remains widespread for offenses such as theft, adultery, and drinking alcohol.

Execution orders require the approval of the Taliban’s elusive Supreme Leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada, who in 2022 instructed judges to fully enforce the group’s strict interpretation of Islamic law.

Rights groups continue to urge the international community to pressure the Taliban to halt executions and other forms of corporal punishment.

Amnesty’s recent global report on capital punishment highlighted Afghanistan’s lack of fair trial standards, placing it among countries with serious human rights concerns.

Google search engine

MOST COMMENTED

- Advertisement -
Google search engine