Governor Caleb Mutfwang of Plateau State has distanced himself from the call by unknown Civil Society Organisation for the arrest of President of Court of Appeal, Justice Monica Dongban-Mensen, over recent Appeal Court judgments, stressing that neither he nor any authorized representative has issued statements regarding the recent Appeal Court’s judgments.

In a statement by his Director of Press and Public Affairs (DOPPA), Mr. Gyang Bere, the governor described the press statement credited to faceless Civil Society Organisation as baseless and a mere fabrication targeted at tarnishing his image.

Advertorial

Calling on the Department of Security Service (DSS) and other security agencies to diligently investigate and apprehend the authors of this malicious article, Mutfwang alleged that the statement is consistent with the antics of mischief makers meant to create confusion and enmity between his administration and the citizens of his state.

The statement reads: “The attention of the Plateau State Governor, Mr. Caleb Manasseh Mutfwang, has been drawn to a baseless statement purported to have been issued by an unidentified group, suspected to be aligned with the opposition in the state, masquerading as a Civil Society Organisation.

“This group recklessly called for the arrest of the President of the Court of Appeal, Hon. Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem. Their claims hinge on the judgment of the Appeal Court that nullified two PDP National Assembly’s seats from Plateau.

“Governor Mutfwang unequivocally states that neither he nor any authorized representative has issued statements regarding the recent Appeal Court judgment. The PDP has not engaged any Civil Society Organization to comment on this matter.

“The spurious allegations against Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem, accusing the Governor of supporting President Bola Tinubu’s administration and former Governor Nyesome Wike, are not only mere fabrications but also an attempt to tarnish the Governor’s image and consistent with the antics of mischief makers who had issued fake press statements to create confusion and enmity between the Mutfwang’s administration and the citizens of Plateau State in the first two months of his administration.”

The governor said that as a renowned lawyer with over three decades of practice, that he knows too well the workings of the courts, upholds the industry of their lordships, will never contemplate or support the subversion of justice or malign the integrity, character and honour of the President Court of Appeal, Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem, who is also a daughter of Plateau State.

He added that as a staunch believer in the rule of law, he affirms his commitment to upholding the dignity of constituted authorities responsible for the dispensation of justice and leadership in the country and elsewhere.

“Hence, Governor Mutfwang calls upon all respected authorities and the public to dismiss this misleading article, meticulously crafted by mischief-makers aiming to besmirch the governor and the Plateau PDP,” the statement added.

The Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal has fixed October 30 to deliver judgment on the appeal filed by Comrade Daniel Onjeh, the APC 2023 senatorial candidate for Benue South, challenging the declaration of Senator Abba Moro of the PDP as the winner of the election held in Benue South.

This was according to the official information transmitted to the legal counsel of the parties involved in the case, by the three-man panel of the Court of Appeal comprising Justices A. O. Otisi; O. Obaseki and A. M. Lamido.

Advertorial

The court earlier heard Onjeh’s appeal on Monday, October 16, following which all the briefs or arguments were adopted and the matter was reserved for judgment.

Comrade Onjeh is asking the Court of Appeal to declare him the true winner of the Benue South 2023 Senatorial Election on the ground that the first respondent, Sen. Moro, was not qualified to contest the election, having presented a forged birth certificate to INEC.

He is equally challenging the outcome of the election on the grounds of noncompliance with the Electoral Act 2022 (As Amended), amongst other irregularities; and asking the court to declare all the votes allotted to Sen. Moro in the election wasted votes, and to consequently declare him – the first runner up – the true winner of the election.

Onjeh argues that if the court cancels all the unlawful votes allotted to Sen. Moro at the last Benue South senatorial election occasioned by noncompliance and irregularities; and re-tabulates the results of the election, it will reveal that it was actually he, and not Sen. Moro, that polled the highest number of valid votes in the election.

The Appeal Court sitting in Lagos state on Friday dismissed the appeal case filed by Hon. Olumide Ojerinde (Omo-Oloore) of the Accord Party for lack of merit and upheld the election victory of Hon. Prince Olaide Lateef Mohammed who was elected the representative of the Irepo/Orelope/Olorunsogo Federal Constituency under the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

The outcome of the Appeal Court has, thus, reaffirmed the 2023 general election when the electorate voted for Mohammed.

Advertorial

Ojerinde had approached the National and State Assembly Election Petition Tribunal in an attempt to nullify the election results.

However, the tribunal dismissed the case for lack of merit and substantial evidence to prove his claim of victory and imposed a fine of N2.5 million as a testament to the misappropriation of the court’s valuable time.

Unperturbed by the tribunal’s judgment, Ojerinde sought redress at the Appeal Court. The Appeal Court, after diligent consideration, dismissed the case once more, citing a lack of substantial evidence and merit to substantiate his claims of victory in the 2023 legislative election.

The decision of the Court of Appeal marks the conclusion of a protracted legal battle between Mohammed and Ojerinde. It is essential to note that appeals from the National Assembly or State House of Assembly Election Tribunals are final, as enshrined in Section 246(3) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and judicially reaffirmed in the case of Ogboru v President Court of Appeal & Anor(2005) LPELR-7473(CA).

Speaking on the outcome of the Appeal, Mohammed expressed his profound satisfaction, describing the judgment as a resounding victory for democracy.

While he reiterated his faith in Nigeria’s judiciary system, Mohammed called upon progressive leaders and supporters within the constituency to rally around him, in a collective effort to advance significant development for the Irepo/Orelope/Olorunsogo Federal Constituency.

The verdict by the Appeal Court has affirmed the will of the people and solidified Mohammed’s commitment to serving the constituency diligently and delivering on the promises made during the election campaign.

The Court of Appeal sitting in Lagos has dismissed the suit by Eseme Eyiboh of the All Progressives Congress (APC) for “lacking in merit” and declared Okpolupm Etteh of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) as the representative of the Eket/ONNA/Esit Eket/Ibeno Federal Constituency of Akwa Ibom State.

The ruling was delivered on Thursday by the panel led by Justice Jummai Hannatu C. Sankey.

Advertorial

In the ruling, the presiding judge said, “We unanimously relied upon the thorough judgment of the Justice Kudirat Jose-led Tribunal, which had affirmed Hon. Etteh, winner of the House of Representatives election of February 25, 2023 for Eket/ONNA/Esit Eket/Ibeno Federal Constituency, as declared by the Independent Electoral Commission (INEC), having scored 33,001 votes against his opponent Eyiboh (16,909 votes)”.

The court ordered Eyiboh, who it said relied on mere speculations to allege that Etteh’s certificates were forged, to pay the sum of N300,000 to each of the respondents.

Recall that Eyiboh, in his petition, had alleged that Etteh, the candidate of the PDP, was not qualified to stand election due to certificate forgery and therefore, urged the Tribunal to nullify his eligibility and declare him (Eyiboh) winner of the election.

An Abuja division of the Court of Appeal has sacked Hon. Isaac Kwalu of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) after he was disqualified from contesting the 2023 general election into Shendam/Quaapan/Mikang Federal Constituency of Plateau state.

The court declared Hon. John Dafa’an of the All Progressives Congress (APC), as winner of the polls.

Advertorial

In a unanimous judgment, the three man panel headed by Justice Okon Efreti Abang, held that PDP’s failure to comply with court orders to hold ward, local government and state congresses rendered it powerless to sponsor candidates.

It ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to immediately issue certificate of return to Hon. Dafa’an as the valid winner of the election.

The Court of Appeal sitting at National Industrial Court Complex, Lagos State, on Thursday upheld the ruling of the National Assembly Election Petition Tribunal in Akwa Ibom state which affirmed the victory of Martins Esin as the member of the House of Representatives for Oron/Mbo/Okobo/Udung Uko/Urueoffong Oruko Federal Constituency in the February 2023 elections.

Advertorial

The three member panel of justice also awarded a cost of five hundred thousand naira against the appellant, in favour of each respondent, including Esin, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

Recall that Robinson Edumoh of the All Progressives Congress (APC), who was defeated at the February elections dragged the respondents to the National Assembly Election Petition Tribunal, challenging the outcome of the poll.

The tribunal chaired by Justice Kudirat Jose on September 1, 2023 threw out Edumoh’s petition, ruling that the petitioner could not prove any of his allegations bordering on over-voting, non transmission of results electronically, widespread irregularities and non compliance with provisions of the Electoral Act.

Dissatisfied by the ruling, the APC candidate approached the appellate court, asking it to set aside the verdict of the tribunal.

Delivering its judgment, the Court of Appeal held, “The panel found no reason to dislodge the verdict of the National Assembly Election Petition Tribunal which affirmed the PDP candidate, Esin, as the valid winner of the election, therefore the judgement by the lower court is upheld.

“A cost of Five Hundred Thousand Naira is here by awarded in favour of each respondent, including Hon. Martins Esin, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), against the appellant.”

The Court Of Appeal sitting in Lagos state on Friday upheld the decision of the national assembly election petitions tribunal sacking Clement Uchenna Eleodimmuo representing the people of Nnewi North/Nnewi South/Ekwusigo Federal Constituency at the house of representatives.

Daily Gazette correspondent who was in Court reports that the three man honourable justices in a unanimous judgment ordered for supplementary election in five political wards of Nnewi North LGA.

Advertorial

The Independent National Electoral, INEC, had in the late hours of Monday, February 27 declared Uchenna Clement Eleodimmuo of the All Progressives Grand Alliance, APGA, winner of the keenly contested House of Reps election.

Returning Officer for that election, Dr. Ikenna Odife said Eleodimmuo garnerd a total of 24,997 votes to defeat his closest rival, Uzokwe Peter of the Young Progressive Party (YPP), who got 24,937 votes.

Daily Gazette recall that Ayeogu Fredrick of the Labour Party (LP) secured 17,796 votes while the candidate of the All Progressive Congress (APC), Nonso Okafor Smart, got 2,236 votes.

Dissatisfied with the outcome, candidate of the Young Progressives Party, YPP, went to court challenging the declaration and return made by INEC.

The tribunal had in her judgment, nullified Eleodimmuo’s victory and ordered a rerun in the affected polling units.

But Eleodimmuo approached the Court Of Appeal and prayed the appalate court to set aside the judgment of the lower court.

Delivering her judgment, the three man panel upheld the decision of the lower court, voided the return made by INEC and declared rerun in 5 political wards of Nnewi North local government area.

The Labour Party (LP) has rejected the judgement of the supreme court affirming the victory of President Bola Tinubu.

In a unanimous decision on Thursday, the seven-member panel of the apex court dismissed the petitions of Peter Obi of the LP and Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) challenging Tinubu’s victory in the February 25 election.

Reacting to the verdict, Julius Abure, LP national chairman, called on the international community to rise and defend democracy in Nigeria.

Advertorial

Abure also described the judgement as “shocking and surprising”.

“The leadership of Labour Party watched as the sacred fabric of justice and good conscience was shredded today at the Supreme Court as it delivered its verdict in the case between our party, the Presidential candidate and the APC Presidential candidate,” the statement reads.

“We are indeed very shocked and surprised that even the apex Court will toe the line of an earlier judgement in spite of all the flaws associated with the judgement delivered by the Presidential Election Appeal Tribunal.

“Having conclusively exercised our fundamental rights as gifted to us by the laws of the land, we have no other choice but to move on.

Advertorial

“We may be disappointed and dismayed by the outcome of the exercise, but we have chosen to trudge on and to remain optimistic of what the future holds for the nation.

“However, there are great lessons to be learnt. What transpired in Nigeria since the February 25 presidential election is a clear testament that our institutions are not working and that we may be sliding towards dictatorship.

“It is very clear that the executive has hijacked both the judiciary and the legislature.

“This is so unfortunate for our democracy, and it is even more for the people of Nigeria.

“All what our forbearers taught us has been destroyed within a short space of time because of the Unbridled ambition of a few.

“The founding fathers fought with their lives to achieve independence for the country. People lost their lives for the struggle to keep our democracy and all these years people have been struggling to achieve electoral and constitutional reforms.

“Regrettably, all of these efforts and struggles have been destroyed today.

“We are also calling on the International community to rise to the occasion to defend democracy in Nigeria.

“Your voices were loud and clear in condemnation of the outcome of the presidential election.

“As we approach the next stage of our democratic journey, we call on you to stand by the millions of Nigerians who are already pushed beyond their limits into unnecessary hardship and penury.”

Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has stated that he has no regret supporting President Bola Ahmed Tinubu during the 2023 presidential election.

He further pledged to mobilize electoral support for President Bola Tinubu in the 2027 election.

Wike made the declaration on Thursday in Abuja while hosting leaders of the All Progressives Congress (APC) from Rivers state, led by the National Vice Chairman, South-South, Victor Giadom.

Advertorial

Promising to carry the Rivers APC and all Nigerians along, the minister said he would never discriminate against anyone on the basis of religion, ethnicity or political affiliations.

“Let me say clearly and to everyone, we owe a duty to continue to support Mr President irrespective of the political party we belong. It is not hidden, my position, and I owe nobody no apologies that I stand firm with him. I stand for equity, fairness and justice.

“I thank God today that the battle has ended to the glory of God. We are all members of the Nigerian state and therefore it is important for all of us to also understand that the Nigerian state does not belong to a particular person or group. A country of this nature, if A takes, the next opportunity should go to B. Inclusivity.

“So, I am not going to discriminate against anyone. I am here for Nigerians. I am here for those who are members of political parties and those who are not members of any political party.

“Mr President, having emerged, is not the President of APC. He is the President of Nigeria. Of course, while he is governing Nigeria, he must also take care of the interests of his political party, no one can argue that. It is natural. But when it comes to governance, Nigerians must benefit.

“The interest of Rivers state is key. What will benefit our state is what we must always project. I am not a member of the APC but I believe that the support for Asiwaju was necessary. Looking at all the candidates from the south, I knew that nobody could defeat Asiwaju. Capacity, and political will to take action, he has it.

“Most of you worked for Asiwaju. Those who didn’t work for Asiwaju we know. It was not hidden. It was clear.

“I am not a politician for self. I am a politician for all. Not me, me, me. Nobody does that. Any person who does that does not want to survive because, at the end of the day, you need people. But be assured that all of us are working together for President Bola Tinubu. I am sure in the next election, those who scored 2,000 would not get 50 votes again because we have nothing to give anybody again because our votes would go for President Bola Tinubu”.

Earlier, Giadom praised Wike for his decision to support the president and begged him to carry members of the Rivers APC along.

The State and National Assembly Appeal Court sitting in Lagos on Thursday reserved judgment on an appeal by Ebitonmo Anthony Alapala of the All Progressives Congress (APC) challenging the victory of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)’s Forteta Asupa Peter in the March 18 election for the Burutu North State Constituency seat in the Delta State House of Assembly.

The three-member panel of justices adjourned for judgment after taking arguments from counsel to all the parties.

Advertorial

Alapala was represented by Dr. Muiz Banire (SAN) while Peter was represented by Mr. S. Larry (SAN).

Dr. Banire informed the court that he had a pending application filed on the 24th of October 2023.

Larry told the court that he had filed a counter affidavit and written address opposing the application

Responding, Banire told the justices that he also filed a further affidavit pursuant to the counter, dated 26th October, 2023.

In the course of the proceedings, the court was presented with two conflicting judgments on the petition said to have both emanated from the Delta State National and State Houses of Assembly Election Petition Tribunal.

The judgment concerned Petition No: EPT/DL/SHA/08/2023 between Forteta Asupa Peter & Anor vs. Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) & 2 Ors.

The first judgment was delivered by the Tribunal on September 12, 2023 by their lordships, Justice W. Kpochi (Chairman), Justice C. Ezeugwu, Justice S. Umar (SAN).

It affirmed the election of Forteta Asupa Peter as the duly elected member representing Burutu North State Constituency in the Delta State House of Assembly in the election held on March 18, 2023.

Larry informed the appellate court that there was an error, called a “slip” in that judgemnt.

He said the tribunal noticed the slip some days after it issued the judgment to the parties. It then corrected the slip and issued another, “correct judgment” to him.

He told the justices that the Tribunal’s secretary informed him that the “corrected judgment” had been sent to the other parties in the case.

Larry said: “There was a judgment and there was a slip, and the trial tribunal corrected this slip. But they prefer to predicate their notice of appeal on the ‘uncorrected’ judgment and abandoning the corrected judgment. It was a minor slip, they predicated their appeal on that.”

But Banire, who filed two applications, disputed Larry’s claim, saying a tribunal’s secretary could not on his own correct any error in a judgment, moreso when the secretary did not inform the other party.

He asked the justices to discountenance the “corrected judgement” that Larry referred to, saying Larry could not on his own compile the records of proceedings and send them to the appellate court.

In his view, only the Tribunal’s secretary could lawfully do that.

Banire: “My lord, it is unfortunate that my brother silk wants to be washing dirty linen in public, but I will try as much as possible to avoid it because this is a situation where from the same tribunal we have two different judgments. From the same tribunal.

“What he called a slip is even fundamental. But those are administrative issues, in my very strong views, what is before your lordships is what your lordships will determine.

“We have a motion filed 23rd of October, 2023. The motion is praying your lordships to discountenance the purported additional record compiled by the 1st and second respondents on their own. That is what essentially, we pray your lordships for and of course the consequential order of dispensing with the brief predicated on it.

“We have stated all the grounds and most importantly, by paragraph 9 of the practice direction, only, exclusively, and only secretary can compile records for the purpose of the determination of any appeal before your lordships.

“Essentially, our prayer is that no party can on his own go and compile records and send to your lordships. The rationale behind the rule is to avoid a situation that my learned friend is saying now, about whether one document is genuine or it is the other one that is genuine, or one is fake and the other is genuine. That is the whole essence of insisting that it is the secretary of the tribunal that should compile the records.”

After hearing both parties and another petition by the APC, the court adjourned for judgment